Verdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country.

Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Mar 19 2026

BONUS POD: Newsom’s Gun Grab Backfires plus Day Two of SAA Fight-Republicans Take the Offensive

1. California Firearm Advertising Law Struck Down

  • California agreed to a settlement exceeding $1.3 million in attorney fees after losing a lawsuit over its “marketing firearms to minors” law.
  • The law effectively banned most firearm advertising, arguing it could appeal to minors.
  • The lawsuit was brought by the Second Amendment Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, and other plaintiffs.

Core Argument Presented

  • The law violated the First Amendment by banning truthful, lawful advertising.
  • It was also framed as an indirect attempt to undermine the Second Amendment by financially crippling gun stores.

2. Ninth Circuit Ruling and Judicial Reasoning

  • A Ninth Circuit judge (Judge Lee, September 2023) ruled against the law.
  • The opinion stated:
    • The law did not materially advance California’s goal of reducing gun violence.
    • There was no evidence minors had illegally purchased firearms due to advertising.
  • The court highlighted a contradiction:
    • California allows minors to use firearms legally (e.g., hunting, sport shooting),
    • Yet banned advertising about those same lawful activities.

3. Governor Gavin Newsom Criticism

  • Governor Newsom is portrayed as acting emotionally and irrationally, particularly over:
    • A .22 caliber rifle designed for youth shooters.
  • The text argues:
    • Youth firearms are legally owned by parents, not children.
    • Such firearms are common for hunting and training.
  • The financial cost to taxpayers is emphasized as a political failure.

4. Broader National Implications

  • The case is framed as a warning to other states:
    • Similar laws will fail and result in costly defeats.
  • The victory is presented as:
    • A win for constitutional rights
    • A success made possible only by organizations with “deep pockets”

5. Shift to Federal Politics: The SAVE Act

  • The second half shifts focus to the U.S. Senate debate over the SAVE Act.
  • The bill is framed as an election integrity measure.
  • Core premise:
    • “Only American citizens should decide American elections.”

6. President Trump’s Leadership Role

  • Trump is portrayed as:
    • Personally directing the strategy
    • Pressuring Republicans to unify
    • Making the bill a top priority
  • The effort is described as deliberate and strategic, not symbolic.

7. Republican vs. Democrat Contrast

  • Republicans:
    • Unified
    • On offense
    • Advocating for voter ID and proof of citizenship
  • Democrats:
    • Described as unanimously opposed
    • Framed as defending an “impossible” position
  • The debate is positioned as a midterm election defining issue.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/be

The Save America Act — FINALLY on the Floor of the Senate

1. Purpose of the SAVE America Act

  • Requires proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote.
  • Requires photo identification to cast a ballot.
  • Common-sense legislation aimed at protecting election integrity rather than restricting voting access.

2. Legislative Status

  • The Senate voted 51–47 to bring the bill to the floor.
  • All Republicans supported the motion except Lisa Murkowski, with one Republican absent.
  • Democrats are uniformly opposed.
  • The bill likely will not pass without 60 votes unless Republicans force a prolonged “talking filibuster.”

3. Argument for Voter ID

  • There is overwhelming public support for voter ID:
    • ~81% of Americans
    • ~75% of African Americans
    • ~80% of Hispanics
    • ~70% of Democrats (non-elected)
  • Voter ID is already required for many everyday activities (flying, banking, driving, alcohol).

4. Rebuttal to Discrimination

  • Voter ID laws DO NOT suppress minority votes.
  • Supreme Court decision upholding Indiana’s voter ID law.
  • Minority voter participation increases when ID laws are implemented.
  • Characterizes opposition arguments as “insulting” to minorities.

5. Immigration and Election Integrity

  • 12 million undocumented immigrants entered the U.S. during the Biden administration.
  • Democrats intentionally allow illegal immigration to influence future elections.
  • Connects open borders to potential voter fraud, despite no specific evidence cited in the speech.

6. Accusations Against Democrats

    • Wanting insecure elections
    • Opposing safeguards deliberately
    • Hypocrisy in claiming to “defend democracy”
  • Uses historical references (Jim Crow, KKK) to counter accusations of racism.

7. Filibuster Strategy

  • Force Democrats into a traditional talking filibuster.
  • Explain Senate rules and physical demands of extended floor speeches.
  • Acknowledge Republicans currently lack the 50 votes needed to sustain this strategy.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Mar 17 2026

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton!  If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

 

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

 

Iran Optimism 

 

Clay and Buck argue that Democrats are struggling to oppose a mission widely seen as successful, particularly as oil markets stabilize and fears of global escalation fade. They also address speculation within a small subset of Trump supporters suggesting foreign influence over U.S. strategy, strongly rejecting the idea that Trump acts under pressure from any other nation. Buck shares insider perspective from his CIA Counterterrorism Center background, responding to the resignation of Joe Kent from the National Counterterrorism Center and offering blunt criticism of NCTC’s role within the intelligence community. The hosts emphasize Trump’s independence and his decades-long public record advocating a tougher stance toward the Iranian regime.

 

Midway through the hour, the discussion turns to Cuba, where a nationwide blackout has plunged the island into darkness following the U.S. cutoff of Venezuelan oil shipments. Clay and Buck highlight how Cuba’s collapse, combined with Venezuela’s political shift and Iran’s military devastation, represents a historic weakening of three long-standing U.S. adversaries—an alignment the hosts compare to the geopolitical shift following the fall of the Berlin Wall. They also speculate on the enormous economic potential of a post-Communist Cuba, from tourism to restored American property claims.

 

Saint Patrick's Day

 

Clay and Buck celebrate St. Patrick’s Day while diving into major global stories unfolding in real time. The hour opens with a lively debate about parades, bagpipes, Irish heritage, and the quirks of genealogy—including a humorous exchange about green eyes, red hair, and whether those traits are uniquely Celtic. From ancestry talk to the Irish president’s St. Patrick’s Day message promoting globalism and mass migration, the hosts critique Ireland’s political direction and draw parallels to broader Western demographic decline, using Ireland’s dropping fertility rate as an example of why European governments have turned to large‑scale immigration.

 

Iran Prosperity Project

 

An interview featuring Shervin Pishevar, advisor to the Iran Prosperity Project, who outlines what he calls a “historic moment” inside Iran as citizens cheer U.S. drone strikes targeting the Basij militia. He describes Iranians celebrating the “precision liberation campaign,” blasting drone sounds from speakers to intimidate regime forces and secretly reporting Basij locations to help accelerate the fall of the Islamic Republic. Pishevar frames the ongoing conflict as the world’s first AI‑powered war, warning that if rogue states like Iran, Russia, or China gain access to similar autonomous drone or biotechnological capabilities, global security could be endangered.

 

The discussion turns toward the Iranian people’s desire for democracy, the economic devastation inflicted by 47 years of theocratic rule, and the Iran Prosperity Project’s detailed 100‑day plan for a national referendum once the regime collapses. Pishevar argues that a free Iran could unlock more than a trillion dollars in trade with the United States and spark an economic boom comparable to Europe after World War II. He also emphasizes the critical role of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi and the Iranian diaspora who view this moment as a turning point after decades of oppression.

 

Clay and Buck press Pishevar on regional dynamics—including how the rapid modernization of Gulf nations like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE stands in sharp contrast to Iran’s economic decay—and on what percentage of Iranians support regime overthrow. Pishevar asserts that the vast majority oppose the government and view the Trump‑led military campaign as liberation rather than intervention. He praises the killing of figures like Larijani and other top operatives of the IRGC, calling it a decisive blow against what he describes as a “mafia state.”

 

Meet the Other Clay

 

Shifting back to U.S. politics, Clay and Buck welcome Lieutenant Colonel Clay Fuller, Republican nominee for Georgia’s 14th congressional district—the seat formerly held by Marjorie Taylor Greene. Fuller discusses the April 7th special election, warns of Democrat

BONUS POD: The TSA Crisis Is What Happens when Democrats put Politics Before Public Safety

1. Government Shutdown Impact

  • TSA officers are required to work without pay due to a failure to pass a Department of Homeland Security funding bill.
  • Over 50,000 TSA officers and 85,000 DHS employees are affected.
  • Officers are promised back pay, but immediate financial strain is severe.

2. Staffing Shortages and Operational Disruption

  • More than 300 TSA officers have quit since the shutdown began.
  • Absentee rates increased from a normal 2–3% to around 10%, with some airports experiencing up to 20% staffing shortages.
  • These shortages have led to long security lines, checkpoint delays, and potential closures.

3. Human and Financial Consequences

  • TSA officers earn approximately $45,000–$60,000 annually, making missed paychecks financially devastating.
  • Some officers reportedly rely on food banks, donations, or are sleeping in their cars.
  • Morale among TSA workers is described as critically low.

4. Timing Worsens the Crisis

  • The shutdown coincides with spring break, one of the busiest travel periods of the year.
  • Airlines warn that continued staffing shortages could escalate into nationwide travel delays and security risks.

5. Airline and Public Response

  • Major airlines (American, Delta, Southwest) have urged Congress to act immediately.
  • Travelers express frustration over delays and uncertainty at airports.

6. Security Concerns

  • The document warns that weakened airport security could endanger public safety.
  • TSA staffing shortages are framed as especially dangerous amid heightened global tensions and recent attacks.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Great Dana White One-on-One: Trump, Boxing, Ali vs Tyson, UFC, Business, Exercise & Weight Loss plus the Best Rocky Movie Ever

1. Health, Fitness, and Longevity Philosophy

  • Dana White emphasizes personal responsibility for health, especially after age 50.
  • Core practices he credits for major health improvements:
    • Keto diet (low carbs, meat, fish, vegetables; no “sides”).
    • Intermittent fasting (skipping breakfast and lunch).
    • Extended fasting (48–72 hour water + electrolyte fasts a few times per year).
    • Cold plunges (3 minutes at ~50°F daily) to reduce inflammation and boost energy.
    • Light weights + cardio, not heavy lifting.
  • Claims these changes helped him:
    • Lose significant weight (from ~235 to as low as 191).
    • Eliminate sleep apnea and snoring.
    • Get off prescription medications and rely on supplements instead.
    • Improve mental clarity, focus, and energy.

Dana White: UFC to issue 85,000 free tickets for White House card (CHECK OUT STORY HERE)


2. Skepticism of Traditional Medicine

  • Expresses distrust of doctors for general health optimization.
  • Strongly endorses personalized blood and genetic testing (via Gary Brecka).
  • Believes many people are unnecessarily prescribed medication.
  • Frames supplements, peptides, and lifestyle changes as superior to pharmaceuticals for chronic issues.

FOLLOW DANA WHITE on Instagram HERE


3. Early Life and Entry Into Combat Sports

  • Knew from a young age he wanted to work in the fight business.
  • Left a hotel job in Boston at 19 to apprentice under boxing trainer Peter Welch.
  • Learned the fight industry hands-on rather than through formal education.
  • Left Boston abruptly after being shaken down by associates of Whitey Bulger, relocating to Las Vegas.

LEARN MORE ABOUT DANA WHITE HERE


4. Acquisition and Transformation of the UFC

  • Helped orchestrate the purchase of UFC for $2 million when it was near collapse.
  • At acquisition, UFC had:
    • Minimal assets (brand name and octagon).
    • Sold-off media and merchandising rights.
    • No mainstream credibility or regulation.
  • Strategic decisions that fueled growth:
    • Embracing regulation (opposite of prior owners).
    • Educating audiences about MMA (especially ground fighting).
    • Securing TV exposure, not just pay-per-view.
    • Recruiting elite global talent.
    • Creating compelling reality and talent pipelines (e.g., The Ultimate Fighter, Contender Series).
  • UFC is now valued in the billions and dominates live-event gates, including Madison Square Garden.

5. View on Fighters and Greatness

  • Believes MMA is superior to boxing structurally:
    • Fighters must face top competition consistently.
    • Harder to protect undefeated records.
  • Calls Jon Jones the greatest MMA fighter of all time.
  • Views Muhammad Ali as his favorite boxer, but praises Mike Tyson’s cultural impact.
  • Believes elite athletes from other sports (NFL, Jordan, Shaq) could have been dominant MMA fighters with proper training.

6. Joe Rogan and Media Influence

  • Credits Joe Rogan with helping mainstream audiences understand MMA.
  • Did not anticipate Rogan becoming the world’s biggest podcaster.
  • Attributes Rogan’s success to:
    • Curiosity and intelligence.
    • Long-form, unscripted conversations.
    • Willingness to engage controversial topics.
  • Sees podcasts as a powerful alternative to traditional media.

7. Relationship with Donald Trump

  • Friendship began when Trump hosted early UFC events at his casinos when few would.
  • Describes Trump as:
    • Personally loyal.
    • Resilient under pressure.
    • Charismatic and relatable in private.
  • Publicly supports Trump despite advice not to engage politically.
  • Views Trump as unfairly targeted and uniquely resilient.
  • Strongly positive about Trump’s embrace of podcasts and nontraditional media.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right No

Short‑Term Pain Long‑Term Results in Iran, Tucker & the WOKE Right plus No Cash for DHS even after 4 Terror Attacks Week In Review

1. No Endless War or Ground Occupation

  • Strong emphasis that this is not Iraq or Afghanistan:
    • No large ground invasion
    • No nation-building
    • No long-term occupation
  • Military strategy described as rapid, overwhelming, air-dominant action.
  • Confidence that U.S. casualties will be minimal and duration short.

2. Military Action Against Iran Is Justified as Self-Defense

  • The conflict is framed as a response to 47 years of Iranian aggression, including:
    • Sponsorship of terrorism
    • Killing nearly a thousand Americans
    • Attempted assassinations of U.S. officials
  • Iran is described as an irrational, theocratic death cult, making deterrence unreliable.
  • Nuclear capability in Iran is portrayed as an existential threat to U.S. cities.

3. This Is “America First,” Not a War for Israel

  • Repeated rejection of claims that the war is driven by Israel or Jewish influence.
  • Such claims are labeled dishonest, antisemitic, and propaganda.
  • The stated motivation: protecting American lives and national security.

4. Gas Prices Are a Short-Term Political Weapon

  • Gas price increases are framed as temporary and expected due to Middle East conflict.
  • Democrats are accused of exploiting gas prices the same way they previously focused on egg prices.
  • The speaker argues prices are still lower than under Biden, despite rising from recent lows.
  • Long-term expectation: Iran’s collapse would lower global gas prices.

5. Strong Leadership vs. Weak Appeasement

  • Trump is decisive and feared by adversaries.
  • Obama and Biden are criticized for appeasement and failed nuclear deals.
  • Past diplomatic failures (North Korea, Iran nuclear deal) are cited as evidence diplomacy failed.

6. Harsh Criticism of Tucker Carlson and Isolationists

  • Tucker Carlson is accused of:
    • Spreading anti-American propaganda
    • Echoing Islamist narratives
    • Undermining U.S. troops
  • His statements about unconditional surrender and nuclear escalation are called:
    • False
    • Dangerous
    • Morally grotesque
  • Isolationist conservatives are grouped with progressive Democrats as a shared threat to U.S. foreign policy.

7. Iranian Regime Change Is Seen as Necessary

  • The appointment of a new Iranian leader (son of the former Ayatollah) is rejected.
  • Any continuation of clerical Islamist rule is deemed unacceptable.
  • Regime collapse is framed as the only path to lasting security.

8. Deterrence Fails with Religious Extremism

  • Comparison between North Korea and Iran:
    • North Korea: dangerous but rational
    • Iran: irrational due to religious ideology
  • Argument: Traditional nuclear deterrence does not work with actors who glorify martyrdom.

9. Public Opinion Depends on Duration and Casualties

  • Acknowledgment that support would collapse if:
    • War drags on for years
    • U.S. casualties rise significantly
  • Confidence expressed that this outcome is “near zero.”

10. Closing Shift to Religion and AI

  • Ends with an unexpected, uplifting segment:
    • An AI-generated Christian apologetic is quoted at length.
    • The response argues Christianity is intellectually compelling, historically grounded, and uniquely truthful.
  • Used to:
    • Provide hope amid global uncertainty
    • Reinforce moral clarity and worldview coherence

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and

Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Mar 12 2026

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton!  If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

 

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

 

 

 Go Thank an Oil Man 

 

Clay and Buck open by discussing breaking developments in Iran, including the condition of Mojtaba Khamenei—nicknamed “Little Mo”—who is reportedly in a coma and severely injured following U.S. airstrikes. The hosts analyze how the Iranian leadership is under unprecedented pressure as air campaigns continue to dismantle military assets and target key regime figures. They also address escalating attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, the resulting volatility in global oil prices, and how President Trump is responding with aggressive measures, including tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and coordinating releases of hundreds of millions of barrels internationally to stabilize markets. The conversation highlights the dramatic price swings of crude oil and examines how Iran is trying to weaponize oil shipping routes to trigger economic turmoil.

 

The hosts then explore how American media outlets are selectively covering the surge in gas prices. Clay criticizes networks like CNN and MSNBC for ignoring declining fuel costs for more than a year but immediately amplifying short‑term price increases during the conflict. This flows into a broader media discussion about the differences between advertising‑driven outlets and subscription‑driven news models, with Clay noting that subscriber‑funded outlets—such as the New York Times—now cater to ideological expectations instead of broad audiences. Buck argues that Fox News at least acknowledges its editorial perspective, whereas CNN still pretends to be nonpartisan despite consistent ideological framing.

 

 

Uncle Bill: "We'll Do It Live!"

 

Clay and Buck welcome media icon Bill O’Reilly, who joins them to discuss his new long‑form interview program We’ll Do It Live! O’Reilly recounts the origins of the viral “We’ll do it live!” clip from his Inside Edition days and how it resurfaced years later as internet culture took off. After the lighthearted banter, the conversation shifts dramatically toward the unfolding Iran conflict. O’Reilly details the stakes of President Trump’s military campaign, emphasizing that U.S. strikes—coordinated with Israeli intelligence—have dismantled much of Iran’s offensive capability. He explains that the killing of top Iranian leadership and the crippling of Iran’s military infrastructure mark one of the most consequential U.S. operations in decades. But O’Reilly warns that global economic consequences, especially oil price volatility, remain the biggest wildcard, and that Trump’s political future hinges significantly on the success or failure of the campaign.

 

The hosts ask O’Reilly what “victory” in Iran should look like, prompting him to outline a diplomatic off‑ramp: forcing Iran to abandon nuclear ambitions, curtail ballistic missile development, weaken the Revolutionary Guard, and end support for terrorism. He acknowledges that Iran often violates agreements but argues that overwhelming military pressure could eventually push the regime toward negotiation. O’Reilly also discusses the Save America Act and the Senate’s political obstacles, noting that although the bill won’t reach the 60 votes needed to advance, Democrats risk political backlash because voter‑ID requirements enjoy overwhelming national support.

 

 

MO Sen. Eric Schmitt

 

Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri joined the program to discuss the Save America Act and the Senate’s procedural fight over election integrity, voter ID requirements, mail in balloting limits, and protections for women’s sports. Schmitt explains how a talking filibuster could force Democrats to publicly defend their opposition and outlines the legislative mechanics needed to bring the bill to the Senate floor. He then addresses the Democrats’ refusal to fund the Department of Homeland Security amid a surge in terror threats, arguing that their resistance to immigration enforcement and ICE operations has resulted in long TSA wait times, staffing shortages, and national security vulnerabilities just as Americans enter peak spring travel season.

 

 

TX Sen. John Cornyn

 

Senator John Cornyn of Texas discuss

FOUR Terror Attacks in Ten Days, and Still Dems Won't Fund DHS

1. Claim of Increased Terrorist Threat

  • four terrorist attacks have occurred within ten days in the U.S.
  • All attacks are described as being carried out by radical Islamic terrorists targeting Americans.
  • The country may be on the verge of a large-scale mass-casualty attack.

2. Blame on Open Border Policies

  • The Biden administration is accused of maintaining a “wide open border”.
  • Claims are made that millions of illegal immigrants, including terrorists, entered the U.S.
  • Statistics are cited showing an increase in encounters with individuals on the terrorist watch list after 2021.
  • “Gotaways” (unapprehended border crossers) are described as a major unknown security risk.

3. DHS Funding Controversy

  • Senate Democrats are accused of repeatedly voting against funding DHS.
  • The speakers argue this effectively:
    • Leaves TSA agents, Coast Guard members, FEMA workers, and DHS analysts unpaid
    • Weakens terrorism prevention capabilities
  • ICE is noted as already funded, undermining the Democrats’ stated rationale.

4. Criticism of Democratic Leadership

  • Democrats are described as being “serene” about DHS shutdown risks.
  • Senator Brian Schatz is singled out as emblematic of this attitude.
  • The argument suggests Democrats prioritize ideology and opposition to Trump over public safety.

5. Specific Terror Attack Examples

  • Austin, TX: A shooter described as a radical Islamist opening fire at a bar.
  • New York City: Two teens allegedly inspired by ISIS throwing homemade bombs.
  • Michigan: A vehicle attack at a synagogue/school stopped by armed security.
  • Old Dominion University: A former ISIS supporter, released early from prison, opening fire and being stopped by a student.

6. Media Criticism

  • Mainstream outlets, especially CNN, are accused of:
    • Downplaying or mischaracterizing terrorist motives
    • Avoiding the term “radical Islamic terrorism”
    • Failing to hold Democrats accountable
  • Examples of allegedly misleading headlines and retractions are cited.

7. Distinction Between Islam and Islamism

  • Senator Cruz emphasizes a distinction between:
    • Peaceful Muslims
    • Islamism, defined as a violent political ideology
  • He argues refusing to name the ideology prevents effective counterterrorism.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook:

BONUS POD: What the Numbers Show: Criminal Convictions Dominate ICE Arrests

  • Central Claim: Border Security as National Security

    • Illegal immigration is not just a humanitarian or economic issue, but a national security threat, linking border crossings to terrorism, sleeper cells, gang activity, and violent crime.
  • Praise of Trump-Era Immigration Enforcement

    • After Donald Trump returned to office, immigration enforcement intensified immediately.
    • 32,000+ arrests in the first 50 days, asserting that Trump fulfilled his campaign promise to secure the border.
  • Emphasis on Criminality Among Arrested Migrants

    • Nearly 70% of those arrested allegedly had prior criminal convictions or pending charges.
    • violent offenders, gang members, fugitives, and individuals allegedly on terrorist watchlists.
  • Focus on Crimes Against Children

    • A major emotional and moral emphasis is placed on arrests of illegal immigrants accused or convicted of child sex crimes, particularly in Houston, Texas.
    • Claims hundreds of such arrests in that single region, portraying enforcement as directly protecting children and families.
  • Criticism of Media Coverage

    • Mainstream media is intentionally ignoring or downplaying these enforcement actions and statistics.
    • Omission is meant to preserve a pro-immigration or anti-Trump narrative.
  • Blame Attributed to Democrats and the Biden Administration

    • Democratic leadership knowingly allowed dangerous individuals into the U.S. through “open border” policies.
    • This was done deliberately to change the country’s demographic, cultural, and political makeup.
  • Use of Polling Data for Political Validation

    • References CNN polling to argue that Democrats are losing public trust on immigration and border security, while Republicans now hold an advantage on the issue.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.